Left’s objections on the Ayodhya Judgment

Before going in to the main topic I wish to write how the civil suits are filed, heard and decided in Indian courts. This will explain the background for the suits generally and help you to understand the general background of the case and judgment.  I was an advocate before joining service and have little knowledge in law. So unlike leftist “intellectuals” “Historians” “Civil Society” fellows you can be confident that I know a little something about what I am writing now.

The procedure relating to civil suits is governed by the Indian Civil Procedure Code. It is a British era code updated from time to time by Indian Parliament and still needs lot of improvement.

Normal process in the civil suits as per the said code can be described in summery as follows:

1.       Any person/s who wants to enforce a civil right can file a suit by

filing a Plaint along with documents as evidence before the civil court having jurisdiction.

2.       The person/s who files the suit is called a plaintiff. The persons on whom the suit is filed are called as Defendants.

3.       After the plaint is admitted and numbered/registered the civil court

will issue summons to defendants.

4.       The defendants on receipt of summons will appear in the court and

file their version in writing which is called as Written Statement. They can also file documents from their side.

5.       The court after that examines the plaint and the written statement

and identifies the points which are under dispute and list out the same.

6.       The process of identifying the points in dispute and listing them

is called as framing of issues and the points of disputes are called as issues.

7.       After the issues are framed the court will allow plaintiff and

defendants to put forward their evidence by way of oral evidence of witnesses on their behalf and these witnesses will identify and produce the documents. The documents will be marked with serial number and taken on record.

8.       Evidence can be admitted only on the issues that is points of

dispute identified by the court as above. No extraneous issue and evidence relating to such issue will be admitted in any civil suit.

9.       Once both sides complete their evidence the court will hear

arguments from both the sides and pass the judgment.

10.     In the judgment court will analyze give finding on each of the

issues framed by it.

11.     A summery of the operating part of judgment will be issued by the

court which is called as Decree.

All the litigations filed in respect of the disputes relating to the Ram Janmabhumi property are civil suits filed in the civil court seeking various reliefs like declaration of title, Injunction to allow worship and things like that. The trial was going on day to day basis in the High Court of Allahabad Bench at Lucknow by a 3 judge bench for several years.

As mentioned above court had framed several issues in each of these suits. It has heard oral evidence from all the sides, gathered evidence from in the form of ASI report documents filed etc and fixed a date for judgment. After a totally botched and failed attempt by Congress inspired litigant to postpone the judgment court has fixed the 29th September 2010 for delivery of the judgment.

The leftist gang who actively collaborated with the Wakf Board in their case caught in their own lies was waiting eagerly in anticipation of a pro Muslim judgment. Many left wing “historians” “experts” have given evidence in the case. For years on every forum they have ridiculed everything Hindus believe and the idea of Sri Rama itself. Extreme leftwing organizations like SAHMAT even tried to insult Hindus deliberately showing Rama and Sita as brother and sister based on some remotely known Buddhist tradition. We all know how New Delhi has even filed an affidavit in Supreme Court in the Rama Sethu project case saying that Sri Rama is a myth and it was withdrawn when Hindus were up in arms.

With all this background left is expecting confirmation from the Judiciary that they are correct. Sri Vinod Mehta Editor of Outlook, a couple of weeks before the judgment said on TV that he expects that Muslims will win the case as they have more documents. What documents he is speaking I could not understand. Sale deed in favor of Wakf board??  Either he does not know what he is speaking about or deliberately lying. I think it is the second case. No property transactions were taken place in respect of the disputed property since we started having records. Then what documents will be there?  Proof of possession? For decades before 1949 Muslims were not performing daily prayers there.  Many incidents of fighting taken place in respect of the same site.  In fact till 1989 it was generally agreed that the disputed structure was constructed after demolition of the Hindu temple.  So how come left thought it would be walk over to Muslims in the court?  Arrogance of the left and lack of opposition to them left them deluded believe that they will win the suit without fail.

Till 4 PM, on the verdict day, all our secular gang singing one song. It is:

Law is supreme and verdict of the court shall be accepted and respected by all. Nothing major is going to happen after the judgment as the aggrieved parties can and will approach the Supreme Court. So no one should feel despair etc.

Secular media & TV fellows lined up “legal luminaries” politicos and Secular gang Page3 gang to discuss the judgment immediately it is delivered.

Strangely they thought they can discuss and debate a judgment which they know runs into several thousands of pages immediately after it is pronounced and made public. Our “secular” lawyers are so great that they can read, analyze, form an opinion of such a big judgment within few minutes of it is pronounced.  They must be  thinking that they are Shakuntala Devi of Legal profession. They are in fact made great comments critical of the judgment without fully reading the full judgment. Complete absence of honesty by these so called legal luminaries is disgusting to say the least.

Media and Government had created great fear and hype that there is every chance of disturbances. An artificial situation is created by the Union Government and press fellows wherein create most of the nation feared something wrong will happen once the judgment is out. For week’s people of lead to believe that something serious bad is going to happen immediately after the judgment. Roads in various cities and towns across India were deserted from the afternoon on that day. All the schools were closed. Is it an admission that we are not ready to accept Judgment and will automatically resort to violence? Entire tension was created with a clear intention to celebrate Hindu defeat in the court as a great occasion.

At the same time Press and TV is full of stories about how the country has moved on from 1990’s. No one bothered to ask if the country moved on from 1990’s then why there is need for fear. 

In the morning at the office, one of my colleagues asked me how the court is likely decided. Since I have little knowledge in the matter and read the news reports on the ASI report I said Hindu side may win.

Most of the time in the office spent on discussions on this matter only. By 12 bosses have informed that those who want to go home by afternoon may leave. Many left almost immediately. Bangalore looked like a city under curfew by 1 PM. I left my office at 3 PM. Many from the morning advised me not to go through Muslim areas of Bangalore on my way back. Taking advantage of the mad situation I came back driving through the Muslim areas to home and started to see the TV news. Arnab Goswamy on times now and see the drama.  At about 4.10 PM Headlines today flashed an item that that Wakf Board’s suit was dismissed.

Within 15 minutes various other main points and the 3 summaries of the judgments started coming out.  Immediately all hell has broken lose in the Secular camp. Management and misreporting of the judgment has started immediately by Arch Secular news persons like Burkha Dutt.

NDTV started running a scrolled that Justice Khan held that there is no evidence of temple being destroyed. But they conveniently It conveniently did not report that he was in minority and Majority judges held that temple was destroyed by Muslim forces.

As per the TV’s land was divided in 3 parts between Nirmohi Akhada, Hindus and Muslims.  Further it was reported that the judges held Sri Ram was born at the place where in the ideal are now situated. Judges only held that Hindus believe that Sri Ram was born at that placed and worshiped there for times immemorial. There is a difference of holding that a faith to be true and holding existence of a faith a true. None of the TV people wanted to tell the distinction.

Unfortunately I could see only one TV at a time so I could see only part of the rubbish that was being discussed and reported on that day and one or two days following that. After a couple of days, everything is forgotten TV’s are back reporting on films, cricket and other page3 items.

Now the problem faced by left is gone beyond one suit. Several of their lies like those mentioned below are under danger of being exposed. Ideas like

There are no temple demolitions by Muslim invaders in India.

Islam is peaceful and part of Indian History.

Lower caste people in India were converted because of the oppression by the Upper caste Hindus and there were no forceful conversions.

There is no historical bases for Hindu faith and it is all myth created by Brahmins (Though the court did not gave any finding on historical base for any Hindu epics in the suit)

There is nothing great about Hindus and the idea of our nation.

Muslims and Hindus are living peacefully together and it is only British who created communal disturbance.

What left wanted is a judgment which is “politically correct” , that is give the land to Muslims and tell Hindus to keep quite and forget their backward beliefs and myths. Instead of that, left now fear that their words are going to be questioned more forcefully from now onwards.  That is why the attacks on the Judgment are there. 

What happen to all the talk and sermons about accepting the judgment and rule of law? Left does not want truth to come out. They don’t want judgment suitable to left politically.

Many readers may not remember what are the views of he left on “Philosophy of Judges” advocated by left and left wing of congress in between late 1960’s and early 1970’s. The sick speech by Late Sri Kumaramanganam then Ministerial of State for Steel of congress in Parliament wherein he advocates judges shall share the philosophy of the government still remembered by many. But left seems to have forgotten its role and what it had advocated then. The position of the left then was the philosophy of the judges should be that of the government.  The leftwing and India Gandhi saw to that all the judges in Supreme Court who does not agree with them do not get any promotion to Chief justice. Now they think we all forgotten. They don’t want the nation to remember what they wanted the judiciary to become and tried their level best to convert it into their tool. They failed in their efforts long back. Now than not agreed with their lies the attacks are on.

All this criticism by “eminent historians” “civil Society people” “Human rights groups” is to continue with their lies and continue with the iron grip on the Indian History. They wish even to put pressure on the Judges of the Supreme Court and overturn this High Court judgment. Let us see what will happen in Supreme Court.

Views of the advocates appeared in Hindu side.

http://www.tehelka.com/story_main47.asp?filename=Op301010Courts_can.asp

Indian left and secular idea in India

The idea of secularism spelt out by the Indian Leftist establishment has its own sick meaning. Like in west, it does not mean separation of the Church and state as there is no Church type institution in India in the first place. Predominant Hindu religion by its very nature is different from Abraham faiths and does not have any church, book or a central dogma to rule over the State. Hindu religious leaders never enjoyed power Vatican enjoyed in Europe during middle ages. Yet the idea of secularism became one of the most politically important concepts for the last two decades in India. The name of our republic was not decorated with the word “Secular” (and another word “socialist”) from the start. This ornamental word was added to our country’s name along with the word “Socialist” during emergency by Mrs. Gandhi. The addition got to do how the leftist establishment works. The establishment gives a great stress for the slogans. The chief motive is to reduce everything into simple and noble sounding words. All despotic communist regimes have words “Peoples” “Democratic” in their name. By using these words they have become “Democratic” and their rule became “peoples” rule. Similarly any one against them is a center revolutionary, petty burguava, anti people, capitalists, fascist, etc. So the word Secular in the constitution of India is intended to be used as a slogan and nothing else. Left in fact considers religion is something like Opium. I do not know then what kind of secularism left is preaching. Is it state with no consideration to religion on the people. Then it is ok. But if it means brotherly relations between all the religions then I wonder does secularism for the left in India mean brotherhood of drug addicts. Once such bad name is given he/she is automatically evil. Once they give a bad tag to their opponents or give themselves some good branch they fell they can do what ever they want. You find them doing the same thing for the last century. During emergency, opponents of leftists in INC came from Jana Sangh and mainly from Hindu right. To demonize these people the word “Secular” is used as an addition our countries name. Other than that there is no noble intention the word “Secular” in our countries name. Mrs. Gandhi gave this tag to our country’s name, while at the same time when she deprived us all our rights including right to life by suspending them in the name of emergency. Our judiciary found no objection to these additions (just like it found anything wrong with the emergency). From the start the INC under Nehru saw emergence and consolidation of right wing in Indian political space as the main threat to his brand of leftist politics. Communism, an alien concept to India, is indirectly introduced by Centralized planning, license permit quota Raj, removal of right to personal property. At the same time, right was demonized first as killers of Gandhi etc and with the allegation of killing Gandhi on its head, Jana Sangh failed to emerge as a national level alternative to the INC for decades. As a result Nehruvian Economic policy was continued to run its disastrous course unopposed. In any country taken over by Communists, teachers, writers, artists are either eliminated (most of the times physically from this world) or converted to make way for the new set of communist ideas and Yesmen (and women) of the party. In India, since there is no overt take over of the government by the communists, they used the slow and gradual infiltration method. Within a couple of decades after independences leftists occupied many strategic positions in the universities, artist circles, etc. Looking back in time, after independence, we find almost no writer, journalists, artist who is not a leftist held any position of importance. It is very difficult now to understand why there was no opposition to these communist ideas at that time. But from the present experience we can deduct that every spear of opinion making by that time is controlled owned by leftists and hence lack of opposition. Perhaps the greatest crime leftists have done is their continued action in the manipulation of Indian history. They have taken baton from the Colonial powers in this. The entire history written by them is only an extension of what colonial powers have written about us. Without any basis they have adopted their ideas to Indian caste structure which was never static in the first place. The communists have supported the theme advocated by Church and colonial rulers that upper castes had and will suppress the lower castes. Some of themes left either created or perpetuated are: 1. Aryans invaded India and killed and enslaved Dravidians who are natives. 2. Present day upper castes are Aryans and lower castes people are natives and earlier Dravidians. 3. Buddhism and Jainism were destroyed by Hindus. 4. Lower caste Hindus converted into Islam to escape upper caste persecution. 5. Entire caste system is shown as upper castes surprising lawyer castes. 6. Foreign invaders glorified and countless incidents of genocide of inflicted on our ancestors are suppressed. Generation after generation our children learned this version of history. But in the meanwhile world has moved on. The Indo China War debacle broke Nehru irrecoverably. Open support extended to China by Indian Communists (from CPM) open eyes of quite a few in India but still left has not lost much of entrenched glamour among intellectual and student circles. After Nehru and short term of Seashore Mrs. Gandhi became PM She had to take support from the communist to against her opponents in INC. With this the left has survived after Nehru and attained complete control over the policies of the nation. Those who are left of the center in the Congress (they are in majority) continued to contribute to the power of this establishment. Most of the news papers particular English Newspapers already drifted so for to left and as of now the editorials read like communist manifesto. Actions of Sanjay Gandhi in forcible family planning etc created some rift between the INC and Muslims. In 1977 it believed that a large section of Muslims deserted them and voted for Janata Party in 1977. Janata experiment failed due to many reasons. One of them being Dual membership. The leftist in the Janata Party saw to that this issue which has no relation to the governance is made a major one rest is history. After emergency the slogan of secularism was not major one like today as there was no political reason. Mrs. Gandhi tried to improve her relations with the right and even attending the function of RSS for the Bharat Mata temple. It is reported that time when Shabuddin approached her for raising some “Islamic” issue she has told him that he and his kind should learn living on equal terms with Hindus. For few years when the regional parties like TDP were emerging as main threat to Congress and INC immediately brought “National Integration” slogan to beat these political forces. At that time even with the excesses of Emergency INC with good grip on the Muslim vote bank had no great need to use Secularism slogan.After the fall of Janata government erstwhile Jana Sangh members formed BJP with Atalji as President. Atalji tried to distance the BJP from RSS base and as a result BJP’s performance in 1980 and 1985 elections were dismal with even Atalji himself losing from Gwalior. With the untimely death of Mrs. Gandhi, Rajiv a political novice became PM with massive majority. Lal Krishna Advoni became head of BJP and trying to revitalize the right. Several regional parties rose from the ashes of Janata Party. Lohiates like Mulayam, Lalu are now middle aged people looking to build their base. Left is still sound and is in control of the economic policy. The Jihad in Afghanistan is going on and Indian Muslim politicos and Imams are looking for a greater role in India. Out of no where Supreme Court delivered its Judgment in Shabanu case and the country will never the same again. More later.

I must admit before posting that I was involved in the movement since BJP got itself involved. I was in BJP politics till 1996. So I have direct exposure to the RJB movement to some extent though I have not participated in the Kar Seva. The mobilization and support we have received from general public was unexpectedly huge even in my home town (which is in AP) You can imagine the extent of support RJB movement had in north India and other places where traditional BJP was/is strong.

When the 1st major Kar Seva of RJB movement’s was done, Mulayam was the CM of the UP. This was nationwide agitation and entire UP was turned into prison by Mulayam. Kar Sevaks had to walk 100’s KM on the fields (they were arrested if they are on roads) to reach Ayodhya. Entire rural UP was exposed to this agitation during this movement. In the end above 300000 people were arrested. Many were killed in the police firing at Ayodhya at that time.

Union Government fell as a result. V.P. Singh lost his PM post and became a great martyr for “Secular” cause. Lalu captured Muslim votes in Bihar by arresting LK Advani and Mulla Mulayam claimed Muslim vote bank in UP. Both resulted is disaster to the respective states in terms of development. Communist Crowd hailed them as great protectors of Secularism. The Muslim vote bank was gone for congress and resulted in its downfall in Hindi heartland in later elections and thereafter entire India.

When the 1992 incidence taken place UP was under BJP and Center was under INC of PVN. PVN kept his nerve and in fact solved the problem in full. After 6th December 1992 there was no mosque or majid or whatever and only a make shift temple is there. Many will not know that the present make shift temple was constructed under curfew and when U.P. was under President Rule. No civilian was supposed to be present there at that time. The mood of the nation can be best seen in the photo published our Cummie Hindu news paper showing a CRPF Constable praying to Ramlala in the make shift temple wherein huge amount of money was on floor being offerings (from the police and security personal). So who built the present make shift temple and when it was built is not mentioned by any one now ironically. The credit of liberating the Rama Janmasthan shall be given to PVNR and he shall be given the credit for building a make shift temple at least.

PVN took advantage of the situation and dismissed all the major state governments of BJP in MP UP and Rajasthan and Supreme Court later up held the dismissals. Kalyan Singh was sent to Jail for one day for violation of undertaking given by him without notice and given an opportunity to put forth his side. So much for justice and fair play. So judiciary got seriously insulted and had held against BJP in both the cases.



In the morning of 7th Shakar Dayal Sharma (correct me here if I am wrong) President of India first time mentioned the structure as Mosque. Till that day it was normally called as disputed structure only. The rioting was immediately started thereafter. But there was a change from the earlier rioting and this one. Police and Para Military used force and many rioters were killed in firing. This was a major sore point to the Muslim leadership that they were not allowed to freely riot. Incidents and Mumbai bomb blasts thereafter are well known at all. BJP has come into power in UP with Kalyan as CM.

There were no developments in the movement after that with BJP achieving its aim of consolidating the Hindu vote and getting power in the center. Since then every incidence of terrorism was blamed on RJB movement and demolition of the disputed structure by our Commie gang in the media and so called historians, intellectuals till now. Godhra train was attacked and Kar seveks coming back from Ayodhya were targeted and killed by Muslim mobs. Firing on Karsevaks, burning people alive in the train, Imprisonment of lacs of people was never considered bad by the leftist media, “intellectuals”, and “historians”.

In 2005 the Supreme Court has directed hearing of all the civil suits on day to day basis and give judgment as early as possible. Since then the trial is going on and a ban on reporting of the proceedings etc is in force. I understand who is who is who in the secular, leftist, “historian” gang gave evidence for the Sunni Wakf Board side and claimed lot of nonsense things. The much talked about ASI report was also examined and the people involved were also cross examined by the Wakf side. The arguments were heard for 3 months. The present judgment was given only after that.

The main problem with out leftist “historians” from JNU and all other fellow travelers fellows is they have told people the following things for many decades:

there is no issue at all in respect of Ram Janma Bhumi and everything is creation of BJP an RSS and other “fascist forces”
the structure is a majid,
there is no historical evidence that it was constructed after demolishing a temple,
there were no demolition of temples by Muslim rulers in India under Jihad, In fact there is no Jihad in India,
all Muslim rulers are great people and there was no religious discrimination under Islamic rule,
there were no mass killings of Hindus in Jihad,
Low caste Hindus have converted into Islam freely because of their persecution by the Hindu upper caste exploitation,
there is no historical basis for Hindu religion,
Ramayana itself is a myth therefore Rama birth place has no historical basis,

All these general contentions of these people were largely unopposed till now. They never bothered to prepare to be examined by others. Why should they ? To be an “eminent historian” you have to be a communist. Only leftist people are considered as “intellectuals”. So all the peers are their own people. You scratch my back and I will yours is the moto. This unassailable position enjoyed by them since they captured JNU and other institutions made them lazy and complaisant. So dozens of eminent historians in the side of Wakf board made no difference to the outcome.

When the records are put to test and all the records or critically examined all the lies exposed. Huge amount of records of the incidents recorded in various books and journals, dairies, official’s proclamations etc proved what Hindus were saying all along. The structure was never uncontested. The structure basically abandoned for long period by Muslims. As a result findings in the judgment are totally different than the communist people told to the nation for decades. Now having lost the face they are making all kinds of “intellectual” statements.


It is not possible for the communist “historians “ to withstand the barrage for evidence in the court of law of all the misdeeds recorded by the Muslim rulers, diaries official documents etc, in general and particularly in the Rama Janmabhumi case. So what is supposed to be a cake walk for the Wakf Board became a night mare scenario. Some 10 days before judgment I heard our Vinod Mehta saying that Muslims will win the case because they have more documents. I do not know what he meant by that. But many like him made similar statements.

The “historians” failed to see the long tradition and belief of worship attached to the Janmasthan. They failed to understand the intense felling attached to the RJB movement. They failed to see the nation memory of the atrocities, destructions and all the tragedies Hindus had to endure for over a thousand years. They has lied their level best in the text books they have written but forgot about oral traditions, stories, books, myths, legends, songs, poems telling the real story of the countless genocides and the effect on the Hindu nation. They have started living in the world created by their own lies. As long as they faced no serious challenge their lies and false dreams it was all ok. But once there is a serious challenge to this established communist history, long established “truths” be it Aryan Invasion Theory or Rama Janmabhumi movement are no longer “truths”. Their entire gamut of ideas became basically indefensible.

The major danger to these “historians” is loss of creditability (many say they never had any credibility in the first place.). They are the no longer have to sole prerogative to tell the History of our nation and civilization to the world and they are not the sole judges about what is what in our history.

Entire basis of the leftist theology is now under danger in India. Let us not forget “ those who control past control future “. By losing the control of the past the leftist gang lost control on the future of the nation. This judgment apart from the liberating of the Ram Temple, will save nation from the leftist lies and liberate the “Idea” of Indian nationhood from the leftist traitors.