Please see this report
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/The-rags-to-office-story-of-two-CMs/articleshow/45711494.cms
and note this para:
However, social scientists are sceptical. Political scientist
Imtiaz Ahmed feels the move could just be an elitist adaptation to incorporate
the lower class as an instrument to safeguard their interest. But it is going
to have side effects, he says. "Issues such as conversion or demand for
Godse busts or reviving the temple movement will flower under such regimes.
Development and good governance will take a backseat. That's because such
leaders generally have a limited-vision of the world and tend to be populist in
nature," he says.
So this "political scientist" ( Is politics a science???
When I was in school and college it used to be an Art subject) thinks that
people with poor background has limited vision. Uselessness to the core.
The so called opinion makers in India be it from English Media or
from other useless "jholawala", "Intellectual" areas have a
pathological hatred toward NM and they will never change.
Normally, even today, it is fashionable to express leftist views and this phenomenon is more prevalent among the so called media persons (corporate news employees), although they have 6 figure salaries and 2 or 3 cars at their disposal to boot.
ReplyDeleteLeftists are paranoid of Hindu religion and they know that they cannot survive if Hindus think and vote unlike all these 6 decades. Now that Hindu masses consolidated their vote and elected BJP, these fellows have become desparate and trying to spread all nonsensical theories and trying to revive their Jholavala image from a dead ism called communism.